Welcome to our new site version. Your web page bookmarks may have changed, please search for pages by title to update them. Having problems ? Please try clearing your web browser cache and hard-reloading your web page first before contacting our webmaster.

Comments on OCD Guidance

[document] Submitted on 22 December, 2009 - 06:34
Keywords Operational Concept Description (OCD) Operational Concept Document (OCD)
Metadata
Document identifier
OCD_Comments_0204
Date published
2002-04-29
Language of Attachment(s)
English
Document type
Comments
Pages
4
Replaced/Superseded by document(s)
Cancelled by
Amended by
File MIME type Size (KB) Language Download
OCD_Comments_0204.doc application/msword   46.5 KB English DOWNLOAD!
File attachments
Introduction

This note addresses the documents 'Guidance for the Preparation of an OCD, FPS and TCD' of 14 April 2002, and DID DID-ENG-DEF-OCD-VF, 'Operational Concept Document' (undated). These documents (referred to here as the OCD Guide and the OCD Template) provide guidance, content and format for operational concept documents (OCDs) for the ADO.

I am currently developing the OCDs for the Maritime Command Support System (MCSS) and the Mine Warfare Command Support System (MWCSS). I am a requirements engineer and systems engineer, both practitioner and researcher, a long standing member of both INCOSE (The International Council on Systems Engineering) and SESA (The Systems Engineering Society of Australia). I have been a member of SESA's Management Committee for over 5 years. I am a member of INCOSE's Requirements Working Group where I have been a project leader and served as International Co-chair.

While the views in this note are my own, I have discussed these issues with many consultants and Defence personnel who have been involved in developing OCDs within Defence in recent times, and I am aware that most of these share my concerns.

In writing this note, I am particularly concerned that skilled practitioners are being criticised for inadequate performance or products when developing OCDs, when the problems in fact lie elsewhere. These practitioners come from a number of different consultant companies, and it is not realistic to believe that they could all be wrong, given the wide and varied experience of many of them.

There has been concern regarding the inadequacy and inconsistency of OCDs developed for a number of capabilities within the ADO. As someone with considerable and acknowledged experience in requirements engineering, both as a practitioner and researcher, I consider that the problems are inevitable.

..

Author(s)
Defines standard
Visit also