Welcome to our new site version. Your web page bookmarks may have changed, please search for pages by title to update them. Having problems ? Please try clearing your web browser cache and hard-reloading your web page first before contacting our webmaster.

Modularity as an Enabler for Evolutionary Acquisition

[document] Submitted on 3 September, 2019 - 10:07
Keywords Modularity as an Enabler for Evolutionary Acquisition architectural perspective

SBIRS4 High (Crock, 2002; DSB/AFSAB, 2003) is an excellent example of how
requirement instability can lead to cost growth. Conceived in the mid-1990’s as an early warning system for missile defense, SBIRS High suffered from a series of management mis-steps. The original requirements called for detection of long-range missile launches. As the program progressed, the Air Force and new users levied additional requirements. For example, intelligence agencies wanted ground surveillance capability to detect rocket-engine tests. The Army wanted short-range missile such as SCUDs to be detected. Tracking and decoy/warhead detection was also desired.These additional missions led to conflicting needs. For example, detecting rocket tests requires high acuity sensors that can
discern small, low-contrast details; such sensors however have too high a false positive rate to be useful for a missile warning system. Solving/settling such conflicts is one of the reasons for cost growth from new/changed requirements (see Figure 1-1).

Metadata
Date published
2004-06
Document type
White Paper
Pages
112
Replaced/Superseded by document(s)
Cancelled by
Amended by
File MIME type Size (KB) Language Download
TH_NShah_04.pdf application/pdf   1.73 MB English DOWNLOAD!
File attachments
Organisation(s)
Author(s)
Nirav Bharat Shah
Defines standard
Visit also