Welcome to our new site version. Your web page bookmarks may have changed, please search for pages by title to update them. Having problems ? Please try clearing your web browser cache and hard-reloading your web page first before contacting our webmaster.

Reducing Biases in Individual Software Effort Estimations: A Combining Approach

[document] Submitted on 16 September, 2019 - 16:59
Keywords OLC Software Effort Estimation Combining Reducing Biases in Individual Software Effort Estimations
Standards groups

In this section, we first differentiate the “composite estimation
method” term frequently used in the software effort estimation field
from our mentioned “combining estimation method” in this paper,
and then we examine current combining methods or practices
employed in software effort estimation, discuss their drawbacks, and
propose the OLC method at last.

Based on reviews of software effort estimation approaches[4-6],
three current typical “composite estimation methods” are frequently
referred in the software effort estimation field, they are Cost
Estimation Benchmarking and Risk Analysis (COBRA)[3],
Incorporating Bayesian analysis to improve the accuracy of
COCOMO II[2, 31] and Analogy-Based tools[32, 33]. However, the
three methods are different from J.Scott Armstrong’s definition of
combining forecasts. Technically, they all combine experiential
approaches with data-driven modeling, but expert knowledge used
in the three methods is just a part of the modeling process: COBRA
uses expert knowledge to construct the causal model; Analogy-
Based tools use it to define similarity functions, and COCOMO II
combine it with historical data to calibrate the value of cost drivers
by Bayesian Analysis.

This kind of composite technique is
“internal” combining and in some sense, they all belong to
individual techniques. In this paper, we refer “combining estimation
method” as to combine the outputs (final effort estimates) of
individual methods by simple average or a sophisticated weighting
algorithm, as Armstrong’s definition mentioned in section 2.1. For
differentiating from “internal” combining, we call it “external”
combining.

Metadata
Date published
2008
Document type
technical white paper
Pages
10
Replaced/Superseded by document(s)
Cancelled by
Amended by
File MIME type Size (KB) Language Download
usc-csse-2009-508.pdf application/pdf   221.98 KB English DOWNLOAD!
File attachments
Abstract

Software effort estimation techniques abound, each with its own
set of advantages and disadvantages, and no one proves to be
the single best answer. Combining estimating is an appealing
approach. Avoiding the difficult problem of choosing the single
“best” technique, it solves the problem by asking which
techniques would help to improve accuracy, assuming that each
has something to contribute. In this paper, we firstly introduce
the systematic “external” combining idea into the field of
software effort estimation, and estimate software effort using
Optimal Linear Combining (OLC) method with an experimental
study based on a real-life data set. The result indicates that
combining different techniques can significantly improve the
accuracy and consistency of software effort estimation by
making full use of information provided by all components,
even the much “worse” one.

Organisation(s)
Defines standard
Visit also